Hairy Stockings For Young Chinese Girls To Fend Off Perverts
‘Fend off’ perverts? I think this only selects for another strain of perverts.
But hey, not EVERYONE is into Wolverine’s legs
SWEET GOD YES. We never got around to making this at work at the soda fountain, mostly because straight cream was so expensive and easy to spoil.
I want it. OH GOLLY I WANT IT.
If you’re not a feminist, you either don’t know what feminism is, or you’re a bag of dicks.
That is all.
This is an excellent graphic.
Don’t be a bag of dicks.
So every time there’s a major emergency, you know, an ‘easy’ day, a Kirk should earn roughly 47% of what an Uhura makes. Wearing a suit and screwing the Prime Directive isn’t nearly as difficult as xenolinguistics and deep comms.
(Source: catlady28, via saintlallaward)
- Albus: Dad, I’m…gay.
- Harry: Albus Severus Potter. You were named after two Headmasters of Hogwarts. One of them was gay and he was the wisest man I’ve ever known.
- Albus: Dad, you say this every time I tell you something. Stop. Just stop.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Albus: Dad, would you mind buying some conditioner? I think we’re out.
- Harry: Albus Severus Potter. You were named for two Headmasters of Hogwarts. One of them never used conditioner and he was probably the greasiest man I ever knew.
- Albus: Dad, this response is really getting old.
- Harry: TWO HEADMASTERS.
- Albus: Yes, I get it, two hea—
- Harry: BRAVEST AND WISEST MEN.
- Albus: Da—
- Harry: THAT I EVER KNEW, BRAVEST AND WISEST, TWO OF THEM.
"Listen, everybody that I meet says they liked the movie. It is unfortunate that people have to preface things with, “I don’t care what anyone else says, but I like the movie.” They should just be able to be proud and happy that they liked “Superman Returns.” I am proud and happy they liked “Superman Returns.” There are people who don’t like it, and who don’t like every movie. I want them to be able to live proudly in the sunlight."
—
Brandon Routh on “Superman Retruns” (via fybrandonrouth)
It does help that so far Man of Steel has 59% on Rotten Tomatoes as of 6-13-2013, with many reviews indicating that it’s surprisingly not fun to watch. People are getting tired of Nolan-style grit, and it’s particularly unpleasant in a franchise that isn’t suited to it. Superman Returns had some plot holes and some terrible implications owing to its dovetail with “Superman 2,” but it got the message right.
People don’t go to see a Superman film to see him tussle and sigh about moral obligations and conflict with his adoptive father*, not for more than a bit of the first act. They go to see Superman save planes and space shuttles and whole cities and the whole wide world, because he’s not a Jesus allegory. That’s the lazy way to look at Superman. He’s the answer to every time we’ve been hurt and bruised and nothing seems right, that “what if” - what if someone special had been there? What if someone far stronger and tougher had run into that burning building? What if someone really could swoop in and stop a runaway train or deflect a missile? What if someone could have caught the jumpers on 9/11?
A lazy Jesus allegory is the answer to our prayers, the spoken ones, the wishes for order and understanding and acceptance. “Salvation” comes later, if at all, suspended either at the point of death or in the afterlife. Superman is the answer to our most desperate hopes and the age-old expression ‘If only I’d been faster/better/smarter/smarter—” because that’s what he is. We aren’t asking the Divine for help, we want someone, anybody. When someone says “save me, Superman!” it means they want to keep living and please please please someone help me.
When Nolan’s Superman starts bouting with what it “means” to be Superman or to be a superhero, it doesn’t come across as a great humanization. It jars with everything we’ve known about Superman in previous iterations, and not in a good way. In the back of our minds we know that Superman has always known (to some extent) he should be using his powers for good. When Nolan’s Superman weighs the question “should I be a hero,” it appears as though that Superman, the one we’ve all known, is withholding rescue from countless thousands or millions of people.
If isn’t seen as initial character development it’s seen as a lapse. Even when taken as initial character development as an origin story, it’s a moral failing. The man who could save a child from a burning building is navel-gazing. The child is burning and so is screen time, and most viewers aren’t going to be thrilled about either.
The movie ponders at length what it’s like to step among humans with the powers of a god, paralleling Clark’s position with General Zod’s. But if Superman is able and unwilling, why call him a god?
If he’s able and hesitant, why call him Superman?
* Which is something which has happened by degrees in several versions of Clark’s origin story, but most closely resembles the family conflict seen in Superman: Birthright in 2003, with parallels strong enough to suggest it was the basis for the film’s dynamic between John and Clark.
(via Still Vapors)
#brb screaming #at first i laughed #but the i started to cry because this crossover will never be canon
AVENGELOCK AVENGELOCK OH MY GODDDDDDDDDD
THUNDERBUDDY OMG IM FUCKING DYING
AVENGERLOCK HAS BEEN MY FANDOM OTP
Thunder buddies, you say?
(Source: letmartyhandlethis, via saintlallaward)
that-flighty-temptress-adventure:
#Homer Simpson don’t give a fuck about homosexuality.
there’s something bothering me about this place…the girl in green becomes black in the last gif. ಠ_ಠ
And the girl at the bar suddenly has a tattoo.
Lesbians are not bound to the same laws as you mere mortals
This seems to have taken place well after Homer’s Phobia, which would explain how he’s so alright with homosexuality. If you ever want to see the Simpsons really skewer and send up stereotypes, Homer’s Hobia and “Three Gays of the Condo” are great.
(Source: ghoststhatweknew, via saintlallaward)
#Character Development
He developed from threatening Dwarves to protecting Dwarves.
He also stopped wearing eye liner.
It was a phase.
I’m not sure, but it looks like here’s been some subtle photo manipulation and makeup work in The Hobbit to make Leoglas seem younger. It would make sense - The Hobbit is set something like 60 to 80 years before the events of Lord of the Rings. That’s not a negligible timeframe even for elves, let alone Hollywood actors. I imagine the eyeliner is intended to make his eyes seem more prominent and youthful, drawing attention away from any subtle signs of aging since LOTR’s taping that makeup can’t cover.
(via saintlallaward)
That is kind of cute.
(Source: distinguishedbaloney)
So for those of you may or may not know the organization PETA is people against animal cruelty.
Well let me tell you a story that I just found out today.
Our dog Boulder is a show dog and he was at a show a few weeks or so ago. PETA was also there and they were protesting how dog shows are inhumane.
So what did they fucking do? They let all/most of the dogs out of their kennels and put rat poison inside the kennels.
Boulder got sick after the show and as they were doing tests and everything they found the rat poison in his system. PETA killed my dog.
My dog Boulder has cancer now which spread to his kidney and his lungs. He is not going to make it. He has lost a lot of weight and needs to be fed by hand because of fucking PETA.
So I want you guys to spread this like wildfire. Tell everyone about this. Because of PETA we are losing a member of our family who is near and dear to us.
PETA is a terrible, terrible organization.
Fuck PETA. They really need to stop co-opting vegetarianism, too. It’s a diet, not always a moral choice - and even when it is, it doesn’t always align with PETA’s batshit values or behavior.
(via sinkingorswimming)
